- Home
- About Us
- MN's Voting System
- News
- Take Action
- Resources
- State Audit Legislation Reference Guide
- 2006 Election Audit Reports
- Auditing Elections
- Electronic Voting
- Handouts
- History of Voting in the US
- Important Reports
- Leading Computer Security Experts
- Local and State Groups
- MN '06 Audit Observation Archive
- National Organizations
- Ohio 2004 Presidential Election Recount
- Contact Us
- Donate
Status of Audit Legislation:
Signed into law 2005
Link to Text of Legislation:
Sampling Method:
one or more full precincts, full counts of mailed absentee ballots, full counts of one or more one‑stop early voting sites, or a combination, per county. The size of the sample of each category shall be chosen to produce a statistically significant result and shall be chosen after consultation with a statistician.
Trigger:
If the discrepancy between the hand‑to‑eye count and the mechanical or electronic count is significant, a complete hand‑to‑eye count shall be conducted.
Oversight:
State Board of Elections
Who Conducts the Audit?:
County Election Officials
Location of Random Selection:
County
Types of Voting Machines in Use:
DREs and Optical Scanners
For more detailed information, see Verified Voting's website:
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/verifier/map.php?&topic_string=5std&year=2008&state=North%20Carolina
Races that are Audited:
One Statewide ballot item per county OR the Presidential race
Voting Units that are Audited:
Precincts
Timeline for Audit:
The random selection of precincts for any county shall be done publicly after the initial count of election returns for that county is publicly released or 24 hours after the polls close on election day, whichever is earlier.
Completed Before Certification?:
yes
Absentees, Provisionals and Early Voting:
Absentee and early ballots are included.
Do the results of the audit become the official tally?:
Yes
Local Contact Person:
Joyce McCloy, The North Carolina Coalition for Verified Voting