Arkansas Recount Laws

This information was initially released on October 21, 2010. Note: Arkansas' website containing a searchable version of their code and statutes has been down for some time, so we are not able to link to individual statutes or sections. However, their entire Election Code is available as a PDF for download at http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/bureau/Publications/Arkansas%20Code/Title%....

Voting System Used: 

Mixed paper ballot and DREs with and without VVPAT For more details, visit Verified Voting.

 

Counting Method: 

Mix of recount, retabulation and electronic review Ballots are to be retabulated and the voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT), where applicable, is to be used as the official ballot and counted by hand. However, not all direct-recording electronic voting machines (DREs) used in Arkansas produce a VVPAT. For these, “the paper record produced by the machine for manual audit shall be the official ballot counted.” While the statutory language refers to a “manual audit,” the paper record produced for the manual audit is a paper reproduction of the “audit log,” which is “an electronically stored record of events and ballot images.” Hence, as with other states utilizing DREs without VVPAT, a hand recount of the votes cannot be conducted, and only a review of the electronically tabulated results is possible. The law also allows for a hand count if the county board determines that the voting machine “may be malfunctioning.” See the Arkansas Code, Title 7, “Elections,” Section 7-5-319, “Recount,” Subsections (c) and (d). See also Section 7-1-1-1, “Definitions,” Subsections (3) and (33) for definitions pertaining to the audit log and electronic voting systems.

Initiating Mechanism: 

Candidate-initiated Election official-initiated Election Official-Initiated Recounts: While little detail is provided regarding this form of recount, the Election Code does state that “The county board may upon its own motion conduct a recount of the returns from any or all precincts.” See Section 7-5-319, Subsection (b). Timing: The statutes contain no timing requirements within which the recount must begin or finish.

Candidate-Initiated Options: 

Candidate determines how many/which precincts to recount Any candidate “who may be dissatisfied with the returns from any precinct” may petition for a recount. No restrictions are listed regarding the type of election in which a recount may be requested. See Section 7-5-319, Subsection (a)(1). Timing: Filing requirements for candidates depend on whether or not the number of absentee ballots can affect the election. If they can, candidates must request the recount no later than two days after the preliminary unofficial results.  If they cannot, the request can be filed any time before the canvass is completed and the results are certified. See Section 7-5-319, Subsections (a)(2) and (a)(3).

Cost for Candidate-Initiated Recounts: 

Initiator pays deposit or bond before recount Payer of costs depends on outcome of recount If the recount changes the result of the election, the state bears the expenses for the recount. If not, the candidate bears the actual cost of the recount, but the total amount is not to exceed $.25 per vote cast in each precinct, or a total of $2500 for entire county, whichever is less. The county board also determines an appropriate amount to collect as a deposit before the recount begins. See 7-5-319, Subsections (g) and (h).

Challengers and Observers: 

Statutes specify that recount must be public Party/candidate or initiator has statutory authority to appoint observers No statutory guidance for recount challengers Section 7-5-603, “Counting paper ballots at the polling site,” Subsection (5)(A), states that “The counting of ballots shall be open to the public.” While it does not explicitly mention recounts, as recounts clearly include counting of ballots, presumably this statute extends to recounts in addition to the initial counting process. Subsection (5)(B) and (5)(C) of Section 7-5-603 also allow for representatives of candidates and political parties to be present when ballots are counted and to “inspect any or all ballots” after they have been counted. Again, this presumably extends to recounts. While these representatives are allowed to inspect the ballots, there is no mention made of their ability to challenge ballots. Similarly, Section 7-5-312, “Challenge of voter's ballot by poll watchers, candidates, or designees,” details the procedure by which candidates, their representatives, and the representatives of either political parties or groups sponsoring a measure on the ballot, may designate poll watchers, as well as the role poll watchers may play. But although poll watchers representing candidates may be present during counting, the only mention of their ability to challenge a ballot is at the poll site, before the vote is cast.

Rules for Determining Voter Intent: 

Statutory guidance provided Statutory guidance for Arkansas can be found in the Arkansas Code, Section 7-5-603, Subsection (2)(B), as well as the State Board of Election Commissioners' document, “Rules for Voter Intent”: http://www.arkansas.gov/sbec/pdfs/2010/Voter_Intent.pdf.

Audit Laws: 

State does not have audit laws As of our most recent update (September 2010), Arkansas does not have audit laws.