- Home
- About Us
- MN's Voting System
- News
- Take Action
- Resources
- State Audit Legislation Reference Guide
- 2006 Election Audit Reports
- Auditing Elections
- Electronic Voting
- Handouts
- History of Voting in the US
- Important Reports
- Leading Computer Security Experts
- Local and State Groups
- MN '06 Audit Observation Archive
- National Organizations
- Ohio 2004 Presidential Election Recount
- Contact Us
- Donate
November 21, 2008
by Than Tibbetts, Minnesota Public Radio
Representatives from the campaigns of Sen. Norm Coleman and Al Franken have been challenging ballots across the state.
It's your turn to play election judge. Tell us how you would rule in the case of these challenged ballots. Use this Minnesota state statute as your guide.
DAY 3 BALLOTS
Ballot #1: The Signature
The Franken campaign challenged this ballot, arguing the voter left an identifying mark on the ballot. (MPR has blacked-out the signature to respect the voter's privacy.) Minnesota law states: "If a ballot is marked by distinguishing characteristics in a manner making it evident that the voter intended to identify the ballot, the entire ballot is defective." (MPR Photo/Laura Yuen)
To read the full article:
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2008/11/19_challenged_ballots/
Categories: Minnesota News